On 10 March, Jane Quigley was interviewed by Chris Laidlaw on his Sunday Morning show as part of a programme looking into the case for higher density housing. Jane features in the first 12 minutes, and introduces the Viva Project and our entry into the Breathe urban village design competition with Jasmax.
Jane is also followed by Jukka Noponen a Finnish planner behind an energy-efficient housing project, Brady Nixon who is developing Auckland’s Vinegar Lane project and the Auckland Council’s urban design specialist Ludo Campbell-Reid.
You can listen via the player below, or on Radio New Zealand’s website.
For the official Press Release click here.
The judges decisions on the Breathe urban village design competition were announced last night and we are thrilled and honoured that the Viva/Jasmax entry has been selected as one of the four finalists to go through to the next stage.
The judges particularly commented on our strong community involvement and our very high sustainability standard. Our Living Village is based around three courtyards with a community centre near the heart and a mix of houses, apartments and a small amount of retail. It is net zero energy, very efficient in water use and the physical design encourages a strong sense of community, with many informal gathering places and layers between private and common areas. The landscape and architectural design acknowledges the history of the land, its natural environment and the cultures that have passed this way.
The Viva/Jasmax team with Christchurch Mayor, Bob Parker
Here are our entry’s three design boards, illustrating our design with respect to People, Place and Planet.
The Press article: Urban Village project finalists chosen (1 March 2013)
You can see the main three design panels for all 68 entries on the Breath website http://www.futurechristchurch.co.nz/breathe and the top 22 (not 58 at stated in The Press) on the large panels in Worcester St between the council chambers and the Art Gallery.
There are wonderful things in all the entries so I think we are all looking forward to exploring them in more detail and seeing what we can learn!
We are looking forward to being given within the next few weeks more detailed briefing from the judges about what they liked about our design and what they would like to see in the next stage, and while the Jasmax design team is in Christchurch for that, we plan to have a Viva community meeting with the architects and the core Viva team involved in the design to share a lot more of the design thinking and detail, and seek your reactions. So more details about that as soon as we have the date.
The next phase of the process is to add a lot more flesh to the bones of the design, and in particular to get much more specific about costings and how we can make the development become a reality.
VIVA/JASMAX WORKSHOP SUMMARY – 30 OCTOBER 2012 at CPIT
(Additions to Viva Workshop July 2012)
On Tuesday 30 October, Viva and Jasmax introduced their combined entry in the “Breathe” New Urban Village competition for Christchurch (http://www.futurechristchurch.co.nz/breathe).
They also hosted a group discussion into what the people of Christchurch might want in such an urban village. The outputs from this are below.
Many thanks to everyone who participated and shared their visions for our city.
• Edible walls and roofs
• Common use of water – storm water
• Different styles of homes
• Lighting to enhance outdoor spaces
• Vastu Design
• Public notice board during building development
• Learning environment in public space
• Zero energy
• Recycling systems – composting etc
• Close to amenities
• One neighbourhood
• Community connected/integrated to outside
• Boarding house
• Importance of good balance of personal/individual space with public space
• Anchor tenant – such as Health Centre
• Community & public space to include gardens; shared meeting places; chickens etc
• Affordability – Ability for low income to own their own home
• Diversity – mix of social housing; owner occupied and rental
• Meditation space/room
• Consideration of elderly – mixed cost/owner; smaller; orientation; indoor & outdoor; community space
• Children’s space
• Disability access
• Shared land ownership
• Simplify list of wants
• Cultural exchange spaces